The Sun is a Nuclear Reactor in the Sky

Picture1

picture source: http://www.nextenergysolar.com/html/energy_efficiency.html

Illustration by Matt Clark

__________________________________________________________________________________________

source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/19/opinion/19herbert.html?hp

Is Nuclear Power Worth the Risk?

EXCERPTS:

“[The] question is whether it makes sense to follow through on plans to increase our reliance on nuclear power, thus heightening the risk of a terrible problem occurring here in the United States. Is that a risk worth taking?

Concern over global warming has increased the appeal of nuclear power, which does not produce the high levels of greenhouse gases that come from fossil fuels. But there has been a persistent tendency to ignore the toughest questions posed by nuclear power: What should be done with the waste? What are the consequences of a catastrophic accident in a populated area? How safe are the plants, really? Why would taxpayers have to shoulder so much of the financial risk of expanding the nation’s nuclear power capacity, an effort that would be wildly expensive?

A big part of the problem at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi power station are the highly radioactive spent fuel rods kept in storage pools at the plant. What to do, ultimately, with such dangerous waste material is the nuclear power question without an answer. Nuclear advocates and public officials don’t talk about it much. Denial is the default position when it comes to nuclear waste.

In New York, Gov. Andrew Cuomo said again this week that the 40-year-old Indian Point nuclear power plant in Westchester County, 35 miles north of New York City, should be closed. Try to imagine the difficulty, in the event of an emergency, of evacuating such an area with its millions of residents. ‘This plant in this proximity to New York City was never a good risk,’ said the governor.

There are, blessedly, very few catastrophic accidents at nuclear power plants. And there have not been many deaths associated with them. The rarity of such accidents provides a comfort zone. We can look at the low probabilities and declare, ‘It can’t happen here.’

But what if it did happen here? What would the consequences be? If Indian Point blew, how wide an area and how many people would be affected, and what would the cleanup costs be? Rigorously answering such questions is the only way to determine whether the potential risk to life and property is worthwhile.

The 104 commercial nuclear plants in the U.S. are getting old, and many have had serious problems over the years. There have been dozens of instances since 1979, the year of the Three Mile Island accident, in which nuclear reactors have had to be shut down for more than a year for safety reasons.

Building new plants, which the Obama administration favors, can be breathtakingly expensive and requires government loan guarantees. Banks are not lining up to lend money on their own for construction of the newest generation of Indian Points.

In addition to the inherent risks with regard to safety and security, the nuclear industry has long been notorious for sky-high construction costs, feverish cost-overruns and projects that eventually are abandoned. The Union of Concerned Scientists, in a 2009 analysis of the costs associated with nuclear plant construction, said that once a plant came online it usually led to significant rate increases for customers:

‘Ratepayers bore well over $200 billion (in today’s dollars) in cost overruns for completed nuclear plants. In the 1990s, legislators and regulators also allowed utilities to recover most ‘stranded costs’ — the difference between utilities’ remaining investments in nuclear plants and the market value of those plants — as states issued billions of dollars in bonds backed by ratepayer charges to pay for utilities’ above-market investments.’

The refrain here is familiar: ‘The total cost to ratepayers, taxpayers and shareholders stemming from cost overruns, canceled plants and stranded costs exceeded $300 billion in today’s dollars.’

Nuclear power is hardly the pristine, economical, unambiguous answer to the nation’s energy needs and global warming concerns. It offers benefits and big-time shortcomings. Ultimately, the price may be much too high.”

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Mr. Herbert,

Thank you for writing this column. I agree with you wholeheartedly. Yes We Can “Change the Source of Our Energy” from a majority of fossil-fuel use. But let’s not recreate nuclear energy, because of the inherent dangers of its cancer-causing byproduct. Instead, we should use the safe, clean, green renewable energy provided by that nuclear reactor in the sky – The Sun.

An easily achievable goal for the United States of America in the next 25-50 years would be 25% Solar, 25% Oil, 25% Natural Gas and 25% all other renewable energy, like hydro-electricity, geothermal, wind, etc. We diversify our nation’s energy portfolio to protect our economy and our environment.

We do not need to build any more nuclear power plants because recreating nuclear energy brings residual problems, like radioactive waste that can seep into our groundwater and cause health problems. We don’t have enough Yucca Mountains to dispose of all the nuclear byproduct.

Energy from the Sun is CO2-free without the “radioactive” part, and the expansion of the solar industry provides hammer-and-nail jobs for installers. With Solar Electricity we could get manufacturing back in the USA by growing the silicon cells and assembling the solar modules. When every building makes its own electricity we strengthen our energy independence and our national security. We can also make the plug-in electric cars that feed off the solar electricity on the roof. The icing on the cake is that we also help our environment.

The solution is a solar-electric system on every available roof and a plug-in electric car in every garage, which would eventually eliminate the need for oil to fuel our passenger vehicles.

Thank you again for addressing the dangers of Man-Made Nuclear Energy. Of course we should close our eyes or squint when that big, burning ball of fire in the sky blazes in our direction. There’s a lot of power emanating from that fireball. Sit out on the beach for an hour and you will feel it. Let’s open our minds to the possibility of using the light, heat and power that the Sun provides…every day for millions more years.

Your fellow American

_______________________________________________________________________________

Read more: http://kmgarcia2000.blogspot.com/

_______________________________________________________________________________

Advertisements
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: